| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Blocked post |
| Date: | 2007-04-02 19:33:18 |
| Message-ID: | 200704021933.l32JXIr01326@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> >> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> >> not sure what the problem is?
> >>
> >> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> >> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
> >
> > What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-)
>
> In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness
> the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of
> our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p
Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email
dates are not a valid method of authenticating the "sent" date. Perhaps
FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating
them. ;-)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-02 19:42:17 | Re: Blocked post |
| Previous Message | Tom Dunstan | 2007-04-02 19:32:34 | Re: Current enums patch |