Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
Date: 2007-03-30 18:49:25
Message-ID: 200703301149.25308.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu, Marko,

I, personally, think that it's worth talking about integrating these.
However, the old versions were definitely NOT ready for integration, and the
new versions went on the internet like a week ago. Heck, I haven't even
downloaded them yet.

Can we address these on the 8.4 timeline? That will give the rest of us in
the community time to download, try and debug the new SkyTools. I know I'm
planning on testing them and will know a lot more about your code/performance
in a few months. Is there a reason why getting PL/proxy into 8.3 is
critical?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-03-30 20:23:58 Re: Arrays of Complex Types
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-30 18:35:52 Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design