Re: patch adding new regexp functions

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <pgsql(at)markdilger(dot)com>
Subject: Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Date: 2007-03-27 13:56:04
Message-ID: 200703271356.l2RDu4T04370@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Jeremy Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Or were you speaking to the question of whether to adjust the regexp
> > > patch to conform more nearly to the coding practices found elsewhere?
> > > I agree with that, but I thought there was already a submitted patch
> > > for it.
> >
> > Yes, regex patch adjustment, and I have not seen a patch which makes
> > such adjustments.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-03/msg00285.php

Ah, yes, I still have that in my mailbox, but didn't think it was
related because there was discussion _after_ the patch was posted. Will
add the patch to the queue now. Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-27 13:56:12 Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-27 13:54:54 Re: notification payloads

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-27 13:56:12 Re: patch adding new regexp functions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-27 13:19:40 Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM