From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Hugh Sasse <hgs(at)dmu(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Documentation access problems. |
Date: | 2007-03-23 18:59:09 |
Message-ID: | 200703231859.l2NIx9k17885@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > The big thing for me, is a single document, zero clicks, that is
> > searchable. PDF and plain text are the only thing that give me that. If
> > you are really zealous you can even use Beagle (which I don't) to
> > preindex the PDF for you for easy searching.
>
> Lots of projects publish their HTML docs in two formats: One Big HTML
> file with everything; Broken up into many HTML files that link to each
> other. This would allow you you have one big searchable document.
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-23 19:30:31 | Re: Documentation access problems. |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2007-03-23 18:48:35 | Re: Documentation access problems. |