Re: Parallel Vacuum

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallel Vacuum
Date: 2007-03-22 18:46:15
Message-ID: 20070322184613.GJ11402@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:24:38PM +0100, Dimitri wrote:
>you're right until you're using a single disk :)
>Now, imagine you have more disks

I do have more disks. I maximize the I/O performance by dedicating
different sets of disks to different tables. YMMV. I do suggest watching
your I/O rates and wallclock time if you try this to see if your
aggregate is actually substantially faster than the single case. (I
assume that you haven't yet gotten far enough to actually do performance
testing.) You may also want to look into tuning your sequential I/O
performance.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig A. James 2007-03-22 19:18:24 Re: Performance of count(*)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-22 18:37:26 Re: Performance of count(*)