Re: Dealing with table names in functions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dealing with table names in functions
Date: 2007-03-22 13:40:10
Message-ID: 20070322134010.GC4102@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jim Nasby wrote:
> Is there a safe way to deal with tables being passed into a function,
> specifically in terms of what schema they're in? I can just blindly
> accept a text string and hope that it's always evaluated in the
> correct search_path context, but that doesn't seem so good. OTOH, if
> I accept an OID, there's no great way to pass that to most of the
> rest of the system... I can cast the OID to regclass, but that
> doesn't get me a fully-qualified name.

Pass the optionally qualified name and cast it to regclass. It will
work correctly when the name is not qualified, applying search_path, and
it will also work when the name is qualified.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lutz Broedel 2007-03-22 13:40:33 using 'ALTER ROLE' in a function
Previous Message Andy Dale 2007-03-22 13:36:32 xpath_list() function