Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ

Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>
> > I don't think it is common. I didn't add that part, so if
> > you also think it is rare, I will remove that distinction. New text:
> >
> > <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a
> patch
> > to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the
> PostgreSQL
> > Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute
> your
> > patch under the BSD license. If the patch is not BSD-licensed, it
> > will be rejected.</li>
>
> I would remove the last sentence, since it puts the responsibility back
> on the group (namely to actively reject).

Done.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +