Re: tsearch_core for inclusion

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tsearch_core for inclusion
Date: 2007-03-16 19:38:45
Message-ID: 200703161538.45803.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday 16 March 2007 10:45, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > I don't see how the proposal is going to solve that type of problem, but
> > maybe I am overlooking something?
>
> The same way as other system tables objects, they don't dump, they don't
> restore. In 8.3, seems, API to index AM will be changed - will anybody
> except pghackers see that? New opclass layout, new opfamily table - users
> don't that changes at all.

If I have configured my tsearch install for spanish (spanish
dictionary/stemmers/synonyms/etc...) aren't I going to lose all that on the
next database upgrade?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-03-16 19:39:44 Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-03-16 19:35:23 Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures