From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion |
Date: | 2007-03-15 22:38:45 |
Message-ID: | 20070315223844.GC9067@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:19:31PM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> Even if we went through the insane pain (for me at least) of maintaining
> multiple branches of the Windows build of PostgreSQL, *and* custom
> builds of the utilities built against a single libpq, we still couldn't
> ship a single set because pg_dumpall.v80.exe wouldn't find
> pg_dump.v80.exe without modification of the source.
Debian for years has been running a system where multiple versions can
be co-installed and if you call pg_dumpall it calls the right pg_dump,
you just have to indicate the cluster you want to operate on.
Porting it to Windows could be tricky though, given its use of symlinks
and wrapper scripts.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-03-15 22:54:53 | Re: PgSql on Vista? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-03-15 22:32:50 | Re: PgSql on Vista? |