Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion
Date: 2007-03-15 20:38:27
Message-ID: 20070315203827.GQ14187@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >I have *no* interest in trying to get it to support an --output-version
> >switch...
>
> There speaks a man who has the luxury of not having to worry about
> multi-version admin tools :-(

Is it more difficult for you to ship a pg_dump-8.0, pg_dump-8.1, etc
along pgAdmin? I think you (and phpPgAdmin?) are already shipping
pg_dump binaries, right?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2007-03-15 20:46:33 Re: Is This A Set Based Solution?
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-03-15 20:29:21 Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion