From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: log_autovacuum |
Date: | 2007-03-08 17:53:30 |
Message-ID: | 20070308175330.GW4715@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> log_autovacuum = on produces a single line of output from autovacuum,
> with additional useful stats. Patch is proving useful in performance
> testing. Not sure what is intended on logging for 8.3....
>
> LOG: autovac "public.w" scans:1 pages:197(-0) tuples:2338(-7199) CPU
> 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.39 sec
> LOG: autovac "public.s" scans:1 pages:1926746(-0)
> tuples:37000611(-3461867) CPU 99.74s/53.37u sec elapsed 7977.20 sec
I agree something like this is useful, but I'd try to get rid of cryptic
notation, and maybe split in several message categories if reasonable.
Your proposal is
LOG: autovac "public.w" scans:1 pages:197(-0) tuples:2338(-7199) CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.39 sec
This looks too much like the old VACUUM VERBOSE reporting, which was
awful. Maybe something like this is better:
LOG: index passes: 1 pages: removed 0, 197 remain tuples: removed 7199, 2338 remain CPU usage: whatever
CONTEXT: Automatic vacuuming of table "database.public.w"
This looks like the sort of thing comparable to picking a bikeshed color
though :-(
Keep in mind that it's going to be translated, so it's not useful for
machine parsing anyway.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2007-03-08 18:03:23 | Re: log_autovacuum |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-03-08 17:52:49 | Re: log_autovacuum |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2007-03-08 18:03:23 | Re: log_autovacuum |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-03-08 17:52:49 | Re: log_autovacuum |