From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WSAStartup() in libpq |
Date: | 2007-03-08 12:21:34 |
Message-ID: | 20070308122134.GD7216@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:47:42PM +0100, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >
> > The easy fix for this is to remove the calls. Which obviously will break
> > some client apps. A fairly easy fix for the WSAStartup() call is to have
> > a check in the connection functions against a global variable that will
> > then make sure to call WSAStartup() the first time it's called.
> >
> > That would leave us "leaking" the WSAStartup() call, but only one per
> > application. This is not perfect, but I'm thinking we can maybe live
> > with that.
> >
> > If not, perhaps we can have it call WSAStartup() everytime we connect to
> > a server, and then WSACleanup() when we shut down that connection with
> > PQfinish().
>
> Taken from MSDN docs, this seems the recommended solution. After the
> first WSAStartup call subsequent calls are cheap because they only
> increment a counter.
Now that I look closer at it, we *already* do WSAStartup() in
makeEmptyPGconn... And free it in freePGconn().
So I suggest the following simple patch.. Any objections?
//Magnus
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
libpq.diff | text/plain | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-03-08 12:43:25 | Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ? |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2007-03-08 11:47:42 | Re: WSAStartup() in libpq |