Re: SHA-1 vs MD5

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SHA-1 vs MD5
Date: 2007-03-07 20:17:31
Message-ID: 20070307201731.GF19042@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I know that there is a md5 internal function on postgresql, but I noticed
> that it isn't the more secure today. I would like to know if there is a
> SHA-1 function implemented yet of, if not, if the team has plan to introduce
> it on PostgreSQL.

What is the problem you're trying to solve? Md5 is probably good
enough for many cases, but for long-term use, you're right that sha-1
is what you need. Actually, you need sha-256, quite frankly.

a

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin

In response to

  • SHA-1 vs MD5 at 2007-03-07 20:04:18 from Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2007-03-07 20:31:39 Re: SHA-1 vs MD5
Previous Message Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha 2007-03-07 20:04:18 SHA-1 vs MD5