From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SHA-1 vs MD5 |
Date: | 2007-03-07 20:17:31 |
Message-ID: | 20070307201731.GF19042@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I know that there is a md5 internal function on postgresql, but I noticed
> that it isn't the more secure today. I would like to know if there is a
> SHA-1 function implemented yet of, if not, if the team has plan to introduce
> it on PostgreSQL.
What is the problem you're trying to solve? Md5 is probably good
enough for many cases, but for long-term use, you're right that sha-1
is what you need. Actually, you need sha-256, quite frankly.
a
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2007-03-07 20:31:39 | Re: SHA-1 vs MD5 |
Previous Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-03-07 20:04:18 | SHA-1 vs MD5 |