From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
Date: | 2007-03-07 09:01:21 |
Message-ID: | 200703071001.21875.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Am Mittwoch, 7. März 2007 07:44 schrieb NikhilS:
> Sure, but as Chris mentioned earlier, wouldn't it be useful to maintain
> uniqueness on a
> partition-by-partition basis too?
Many things might be useful, but the aim of the "table partitioning" venture
is believed to be the provision of a transparent interface to the existing
do-it-yourself partitioning facilities. Therefore, the logical definition of
a table must continue to work unchanged (or alternatively, the use of the
feature must be prohibited if that cannot be guaranteed in a particular
case). Other features such as uniqueness on a partition basis might also be
useful but you can do that today and you don't need partitioning for that.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-03-07 10:26:40 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2007-03-07 08:49:09 | Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-03-07 10:26:40 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-03-07 07:49:53 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |