Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Chris Campbell <chris(at)bignerdranch(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?
Date: 2007-03-03 02:40:54
Message-ID: 200703030240.l232esI14731@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It wouldn't really be any different from errcode(), but if you want
> >> I'll do it.
>
> > If you would just add the infrastructure I can add the LOG part.
>
> OK, I applied a patch that covers the same territory as your patch of
> Wednesday evening. I didn't do anything about Simon's original patch
> --- I assume that needs some rework now.

Thanks. I will rework Simon's.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-03 02:43:54 Re: Deadlock with pg_dump?
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2007-03-03 01:25:38 Re: SE-Linux/PostgreSQL work?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-03 02:43:54 Re: Deadlock with pg_dump?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-03-03 00:42:14 Re: Arrays of Complex Types