Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Warren Turkal <wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org>
Subject: Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question)
Date: 2007-02-26 19:52:58
Message-ID: 20070226195258.GF19104@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the
> >>> early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found.
> >> Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an
> >> issue with re-creating the SVN repo.
> >>
> >> Joshua, do you run "trac-admin /path/to/trac/env resync" after
> >> rebuilding the repository? (This command would re-sync the trac database
> >> with the repository.) Otherwise I would certainly expect such issues as
> >> Alvaro describes.
> >
> > Oh... Well now, isn't that interesting. I will enable that today :)
>
> O.k. I have done this. You guys can see the results at:
>
> http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgsql

Hmm, this seems to make a lot more sense. Thanks.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-26 19:54:05 Re: Simple Column reordering
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-26 19:52:03 Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?