| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrej Ricnik-Bay <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Brandon Aiken <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) |
| Date: | 2007-02-23 02:46:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20070223024607.GE7744@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> >> Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
> >>> On 2/23/07, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
> >>>> That depends greatly on what you're doing with it. Generally, as soon
> >>>> as you start throwing a multi-user workload at it, MySQL stops
> >>>> scaling. http://tweakers.net recently did a study on that.
> >>> I think I recall that wikipedia uses MySQL ... they get quite a few
> >>> hits, too, I believe.
> >> And outages if you watch :)
> >
> > Does this mean that we believe the Wikipedia would not suffer any
> > outages if it ran on Postgres?
>
> I believe it would suffer less outage yes.
And how is SourceForge doing these days, by the way?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-23 02:50:18 | Re: Wikipedia on Postgres (was Re: postgresql vs mysql) |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2007-02-23 01:53:25 | Re: postgresql vs mysql |