| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Phil Currier <pcurrier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Column storage positions |
| Date: | 2007-02-21 16:04:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20070221160438.GD30975@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:59:12PM +0100, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> I think you'd want to have a flag per field that tell you if the user
> has overridden the storage pos for that specific field. Otherwise,
> the next time you have to chance to optimize the ordering, you might
> throw away changes that the admin has done on purpose.
Why would you want to let the admin have any say at all about the
storage order?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | José Orlando Pereira | 2007-02-21 16:09:56 | Re: Proposal: Change of pg_trigger.tg_enabled and adding |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-21 15:34:02 | Re: Column storage positions |