From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Hammond <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |
Date: | 2007-02-21 14:30:47 |
Message-ID: | 200702211430.l1LEUlO00243@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:22:30PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Hammond wrote:
> > > I know it's mentioned in the FAQ, but I'd like to have a separate page
> > > that describes what a minor release is, and why it's a good idea to
> > > keep up with them. Basically, I want something simple and clear to
> > > point middle-managers at when they ask me why I want to upgrade the
> > > database.
> > >
> > > I'm willing to write it, if there's a consensus that it would be worth
> > > having.
> >
> > I think adding to the FAQ is the best solution. What additional
> > information to we need there?
>
> I think it's important enough (and unclear enough to a lot of people)
> that it shuold have it's own non-FAQ section. Either as a page on the
> website or as a page in the documentation.
If you look at the developer documentation, you will see I overhauled
the instructions for upgrading a minor release:
http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/install-upgrading.html
I think that would be a good place to add more text. What additional
text do we need? Something about how you are less likely to hit a new
bug if you minor upgrade than if you stay on an older release?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-02-21 14:47:16 | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-02-21 08:53:43 | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-02-21 14:47:16 | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-02-21 08:53:43 | Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? |