From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] BLCKSZ fun facts |
Date: | 2007-02-20 23:50:50 |
Message-ID: | 200702202350.l1KNoo704993@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I have implemented your ideas for checking BLCKSZ >= 1024, and having
initdb adjust shared buffers checks based on BLCKSZ.
Patch attached and applied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The smallest BLCKSZ that you can compile is 256. But ...
>
> The smallest BLCKSZ that actually works is 1024, because of this code in
> guc.c:
>
> case GUC_UNIT_BLOCKS:
> val /= (BLCKSZ / 1024);
>
> Maybe it's worth adding an #error here to prevent smaller sizes being
> used?
>
> The smallest BLCKSZ that passes the regression tests is 4096. With
> smaller settings your get half a dozen ordering differences, which
> seems OK.
>
> The shared memory configuration code in initdb doesn't know about
> BLCKSZ, so with smaller sizes you get less shared buffers. Maybe that
> is worth fixing sometime.
>
> Aside from that my pgbench testing clearly shows that block sizes larger
> than 2048 become progressively slower. Go figure.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2007-02-20 23:59:03 | --enable-xml instead of --with-libxml? |
Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2007-02-20 23:49:49 | Re: [pgsql-patches] [HACKERS] less privileged pl install |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2007-02-20 23:59:03 | --enable-xml instead of --with-libxml? |
Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2007-02-20 23:49:49 | Re: [pgsql-patches] [HACKERS] less privileged pl install |