Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion
Date: 2007-02-20 21:31:41
Message-ID: 20070220213141.GE25424@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> FYI, I added this to the patches queue because I think we decided
> full-text indexing should be in the core. If I am wrong, please let me
> know.

One of the objections I remember to this particular implementation was
that configuration should be done using functions rather than new syntax
in gram.y. This seems a good idea because it avoids bloating the
grammar, while still allowing dependency tracking, pg_dump support,
syscache support etc.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey E. Koposov 2007-02-20 22:04:32 Re: Column storage positions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-20 21:23:36 Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-20 22:10:45 Re: [pgsql-patches] pg_get_domaindef
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-20 21:23:36 Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion