Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Date: 2007-02-19 20:08:22
Message-ID: 200702192008.l1JK8Md24270@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:33:24AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> >>> Somehow this seems like implementing RAID within postgres,
> >> RAID and LVM too. I can't get excited about re-inventing those wheels
> >> when perfectly good implementations already exist for us to sit on top of.
> >
> > Ok, warning, this is a "you know what would be sweet" moment.
>
> The dreaded words from a developers mouth to every manager in the world.

Yea, I just instinctively hit "delete" when I saw that phrase.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-02-19 20:23:27 Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-19 20:07:07 Re: proposed todo: use insert/update returning anywhere a table is allowed