Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Chatter on DROP SOMETHING IF EXISTS
Date: 2007-02-19 15:43:32
Message-ID: 200702191643.34200.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 15:57 schrieb Tom Lane:
> The precedent that I'm thinking about is that the command tag for COMMIT
> varies depending on what it actually did.

Some have also argued against that in the past, so I guess we just have
different ideas of how it should work. Not a problem.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-19 15:50:39 Re: pg_proc without oid?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-02-19 15:40:39 Re: pg_proc without oid?