| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
| Date: | 2007-02-17 09:20:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200702171020.09991.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
David Fetter wrote:
> What is it about having the whole match, pre-match and post-match
> available that you're objecting to? Are you saying there aren't
> common uses for any or all of these? Regular expression users use
> them all over the place,
You keep saying that, and I keep saying please show a use case.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-02-17 11:08:33 | Re: [GENERAL] [ANNOUNCE] Advisory on possibly insecure security definer functions |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-02-17 09:11:07 | Re: n-gram search function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chad Wagner | 2007-02-17 13:53:08 | Re: \prompt for psql |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2007-02-17 08:23:17 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |