| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
| Date: | 2007-02-16 18:19:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200702161919.56500.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
David Fetter wrote:
> > The question is, what is the use case? If there is one in Perl,
> > can this proposed function API support it?
>
> Perl makes the following variables available in any regex match,
That is not a use case.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2007-02-16 18:28:39 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-02-16 18:03:32 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2007-02-16 18:28:39 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-02-16 18:03:32 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |