From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>, "pgsql-general postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Small request re error message |
Date: | 2007-02-16 21:56:23 |
Message-ID: | 20070216165623.4e859881.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In response to Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> Scott Ribe wrote:
> > Could the below message be modified:
> >
> > The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272, but
> > the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822.
> >
> > By also showing the version numbers in hex, like so:
> >
> > The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272
> > (0x36030000), but the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822
> > (0x00000336).
> >
> > This would have saved me a couple of minutes' worth of puzzlement. With Macs
> > out there that look identical between the PPC and x86 versions, this kind of
> > error has gotten a lot easier to make ;-)
>
> I don't understand how the hex values help.
With the hex values, it becomes immediately obvious that the problem is
caused by endianess (to me, anyway)
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2007-02-16 22:02:09 | Re: Priorities for users or queries? |
Previous Message | Benjamin Arai | 2007-02-16 21:56:08 | Re: Priorities for users or queries? |