Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
Date: 2007-02-16 05:39:04
Message-ID: 20070216053904.GC29933@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian escribió:
>
> Followup --- something weird is going on. I am seeing _random_ failures
> of the regression tests here in that same place, and the build farm
> seems to fail in the same place, but with different row counts.

This failure is pretty interesting:

--- 724,730 ----
date_part( 'isoyear', d1) AS isoyear, date_part( 'week', d1) AS week,
date_part( 'dow', d1) AS dow
FROM TIMESTAMP_TBL WHERE d1 BETWEEN '1902-01-01' AND '2038-01-01';
! ERROR: relation "timestamp_tbl" does not exist
-- TO_CHAR()
SELECT '' AS to_char_1, to_char(d1, 'DAY Day day DY Dy dy MONTH Month month RM MON Mon mon')
FROM TIMESTAMPTZ_TBL;

http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=agouti&dt=2007-02-16%2005:15:01

How can the table fail to exist, and yet not report a problem when it
was created?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-16 05:49:06 further bootstrap cleanup
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-16 05:17:38 further bootstrap cleanup