From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates |
Date: | 2007-02-14 21:17:14 |
Message-ID: | 200702142117.l1ELHEl07543@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Brendan Jurd wrote:
> > > > On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > > > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > > > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > > > >> I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
> > > > > > >> errors for invalid pattern combinations.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do we do with other invalid pattern combinations in to_char() now?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mostly, we return bogus results :-(. The formatting.c code in general
> > > > > > doesn't seem very robust.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yep, seems every release I am in there cleaning up some mistake repeated
> > > > > multiple times in the code. It needs a good cleaning.
> > > >
> > > > I'm happy to volunteer to do something about the invalid field
> > > > combinations, but I suspect an overhaul of formatting.c is more than I
> > > > can currently chew. I figure it would be a bit misguided of me to put
> > > > together a patch for invalid field combinations if somebody is about
> > > > to do a rewrite of much of the code?
> > >
> > > Yea, I was just throwing out a note that someday if someone has time,
> > > that file need a good sweeping.
> >
> > Sorry, I wasn't clear. No one is currently working on overhauling
> > formatting.c, so if you want to submit _any_ patch to improve the file,
> > please do. :-)
>
> It'll be a pleasure Bruce. I think it would be best to wait until the
> existing ISO week date patch has gone through before working on it
> though.
OK.
> Perhaps a TODO item is in order?
Sure, good suggestion.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Webb Sprague | 2007-02-14 21:22:56 | Re: backup database by cloning itself |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-02-14 21:15:45 | Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-14 22:13:02 | Re: SSL enhancement patch ver.2 |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-02-14 21:15:45 | Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates |