Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Subject: Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Date: 2007-02-13 13:52:28
Message-ID: 20070213135228.GA2034@svana.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 08:08:31PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> > In my memory I remember a site that displayed the code coverage of the
> > regression tests, but I can't find it now. Does anybody know?
> >
>
> Are you thinking of spikesource? According to thier numbers, we currently
> cover about 40% of the code base.
>
> http://developer.spikesource.com/info/search.php?c=POSTGRESQL&view=details

Yes, that was it, except I can't access the details, the redirection is
broken. However, with that info it would be nice to see which areas
could be better covered.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-13 14:22:08 Re: Variable length varlena headers redux
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-02-13 13:49:00 Re: Variable length varlena headers redux