| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Richard Troy <rtroy(at)sciencetools(dot)com>, Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp |
| Date: | 2007-02-08 20:32:41 |
| Message-ID: | 200702082032.l18KWfr01501@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Is this a new policy that after discussion, all patches must be
> > > resubmitted with a summary and conclusions of the discussion? I can
> > > certainly do that for you, but just tell me if you are going to ask the
> > > same from everyone.
> >
> > No, I am asking only this time because I feel there was too much
> > disconnect between the patch and the extensive replication discussion
> > that few community members would see the connection.
>
> FYI, in my opinion the trigger addition is clearly useful to Mammoth
> Replicator as well. In fact, it's so obviously useful that I didn't see
> a need to state that in the original thread where it was discussed.
Right, I know it is useful too, but I would like a layout of what it
does and why so everyone is clear on it.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-08 20:32:52 | Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch |
| Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2007-02-08 20:32:05 | Re: referential Integrity and SHARE locks |