| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: email is fast! |
| Date: | 2007-02-08 16:40:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20070208164018.GB1305@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:01:43PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Does postfix do any 'caching of results'? For instance, if it got a failed
> response, would it cache that and re-use that later, pending it timing out in
> its own cache? So try 1 failed, try 2 used cache and failed, try 3 was after
> cache timed out and re-tried, at which point the local DNS server had the right
> value ...
No, but your local resolver, which probably caches, almost certainly
does.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-02-09 05:38:38 | Re: [HACKERS] doxygen.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-02-08 16:30:46 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Fwd: [webmaster] Documentation > What's New still refers to version 8.1 |