From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Wittel <gwittel(at)proofpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Odd PL/PgSQL Error -- relation "X" does not exist when using index expression |
Date: | 2007-02-08 15:55:04 |
Message-ID: | 20070208155504.GA78152@winnie.fuhr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:32:25AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> My advice is not to try to execute multiple commands in the same EXECUTE
> string --- if we were going to do anything to "fix" this, I think it
> would be along the lines of enforcing that advice. Trying to make the
> world safe for it doesn't sound productive.
The SPI_execute() documentation does mention that multiple commands
are allowed:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/spi-spi-execute.html
"You may pass multiple commands in one string. SPI_execute returns
the result for the command executed last. The count limit applies
to each command separately, but it is not applied to hidden commands
generated by rules.
"When read_only is false, SPI_execute increments the command counter
and computes a new snapshot before executing each command in the
string."
Should that documentation be modified?
--
Michael Fuhr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-08 15:59:16 | Re: Odd PL/PgSQL Error -- relation "X" does not exist when using index expression |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-08 15:32:25 | Re: Odd PL/PgSQL Error -- relation "X" does not exist when using index expression |