From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: replication choices |
Date: | 2007-02-06 16:28:44 |
Message-ID: | 20070206162844.GE26733@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:17:52PM -0800, Ben wrote:
> familiar with Slony, and from what I understand, using Slony with bad
> networks leads to bad problems. I'm also not sure that Slony supports
> replicating from multiple sources to the same postgres install, even if
> each replication process is writing to a different schema.
Yes, you can have multiple origins into the same database, without a
problem. I'd be worried for sure about the network unreliability,
though. You might, however, be able to do this usefully using the
log shipping features of Slony.
I would _not_ worry about the outbound replication from the centre,
assuming that the changes are infrequent.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-06 16:33:49 | Re: PostgreSQL on Solaris: Changing Compilers During Point Upgrade |
Previous Message | Tim Tassonis | 2007-02-06 16:19:28 | Re: PostgreSQL/FireBird |