Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch
Date: 2007-02-05 19:44:38
Message-ID: 20070205194438.GH7196@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >>I think the patch is ready. Please remove the PHANTOMCID_DEBUG define
> >>and ifdef blocks before applying.
> >
> >BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's
> >nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk.
> >Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is
> >"merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring.
>
> MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts...

Dual cid? Double cid?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-05 21:40:41 Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch
Previous Message Andrew Hammond 2007-02-05 18:53:58 Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2007-02-05 20:53:31 Re: TM formating patch
Previous Message Rich Teer 2007-02-05 19:16:35 BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ