From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch |
Date: | 2007-02-05 19:44:38 |
Message-ID: | 20070205194438.GH7196@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >>I think the patch is ready. Please remove the PHANTOMCID_DEBUG define
> >>and ifdef blocks before applying.
> >
> >BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's
> >nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk.
> >Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is
> >"merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring.
>
> MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts...
Dual cid? Double cid?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-05 21:40:41 | Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch |
Previous Message | Andrew Hammond | 2007-02-05 18:53:58 | Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-02-05 20:53:31 | Re: TM formating patch |
Previous Message | Rich Teer | 2007-02-05 19:16:35 | BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ |