From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp |
Date: | 2007-02-03 22:20:45 |
Message-ID: | 200702032220.l13MKjo25268@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> I don't have any such paper and the proof of concept will be the
> implementation of the system. I do however see enough resistance against
> this proposal to withdraw the commit timestamp at this time. The new
> replication system will therefore require the installation of a patched,
> non-standard PostgreSQL version, compiled from sources cluster wide in
> order to be used. I am aware that this will dramatically reduce it's
> popularity but it is impossible to develop this essential feature as an
> external module.
>
> I thank everyone for their attention.
Going and working on it on your own doesn't seem like the proper
solution. I don't see people objecting to adding it, but they want it
work, which I am sure you want too. You have to show how it will work
and convince others of that, and then you have a higher chance it will
work, and be in the PostgreSQL codebase.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-03 22:25:17 | Re: Proposal: Change of pg_trigger.tg_enabled and adding |
Previous Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2007-02-03 22:19:15 | Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp |