From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Roman Nowak <roman_nowak(at)poczta(dot)onet(dot)pl>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value |
Date: | 2007-01-31 02:00:28 |
Message-ID: | 200701310200.l0V20Sd08345@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I can confirm this is a bug. Added to the TODO list:
> > o ARRAY[[1,2],[3,4]])[1] should return the same values as
> > ARRAY[[1,2],[3,4]])[1:1];
>
> This is not a bug, this is a definitional disagreement, and your TODO
> entry presupposes an answer that I don't particularly agree with.
Well, our documentation suggests thaat [1] is the same as [1:1]:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/arrays.html#AEN5791
What is the issue here that makes that not true?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-31 03:44:17 | Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-31 00:19:11 | Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-31 03:44:17 | Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-31 00:19:11 | Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-31 03:44:17 | Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-31 00:19:11 | Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value |