Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Date: 2007-01-28 14:06:15
Message-ID: 200701281406.l0SE6FV02047@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-patches pgsql-sql

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This patch has broken much of the buildfarm.
>
> > I think it is because I didn't have #include <signal.h> in exec.c. Added.
>
> Doesn't seem to have helped ...

It did for some, and using the built-in macro fixed the rest.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-28 14:22:49 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-28 14:05:16 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-28 14:22:49 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-28 14:05:16 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-28 14:22:49 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-28 14:05:16 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was