Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Date: 2007-01-28 02:33:32
Message-ID: 200701280233.l0S2XWn04496@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-patches pgsql-sql

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> Good idea. I only have sys_siglist[] on BSD/OS, and Linux and FreeBSD
> >> have that too, so I only used that. We will now print both signal
> >> descriptions and numbers for backend error exits, and descriptions only
> >> for pclose() because we only have a three-argument function to log.
> >> Attached and applied.
>
> This patch has broken much of the buildfarm.

I think it is because I didn't have #include <signal.h> in exec.c. Added.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-28 05:24:23 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-28 02:24:37 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-01-28 04:07:07 Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-28 02:24:37 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-28 05:24:23 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-28 02:24:37 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was