From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Schmidt <michaelmschmidt(at)msn(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Password issue revisited |
Date: | 2007-01-28 01:35:25 |
Message-ID: | 200701280135.l0S1ZPT01054@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Michael Schmidt wrote:
> Fellow PostgreSQL fans, Last year there was a pretty lengthy discussion
> (Tom Lane offered a lot of insights) on this list about deprecating
> the PGPASSWORD environmental variable. I understand the security issues
> here very well. However, up through version 8.1, it has been easy to
> use pg_dump and pg_restore from other applications (PHP, Java, etc.)
> by capturing the Password prompt on stderr and sending the password on
> stdin. No more. Now, this interaction is done on low-level I/O data
> streams. Also, it appears from the documentation that the PGPASSFILE
> environmental variable has been deprecated for pg_dump and pg_restore.
> It appears the only way these utilities can run from a script or other
> application is to ensure that the user specified in the command-line
> has a .pgpass file.
>
> I would like to ask that we return to outputting the Password prompt
> on stderr and accepting password input on stdin. Here are the reasons.
Unlikely.
> 1. I don't see that this would pose a major security risk. In fact,
> in applications where the user enters the password for each session,
> the password need never be saved to disk, which seems a definite
> security advantage. Some folks have noted that .pgpass is a plain text
> file, hence it could be vulnerable.
This doesn't work if the command actually is taking data from stdin.
> 2. PostgreSQL has a tradition of respecting generally accepted
> standards. The use of high-level input/output is a standard for many
> programming languages.
It is _not_ typical to read a password from stdin. I am sure you can
find some tools that do this, but most do not.
> 3. PostgreSQL has a tradition of cross-platform compatibility. Use
> of high-level input/output allows cross-platform applications (e.g.,
> Java) to interact with PostgreSQL in a straightforward and standardized
> fashion.
> 4. Low level input/output is considerably more difficult and less
> reliable for other applications to access and work with.
The change is to read from /dev/tty.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-28 01:46:33 | Re: Password issue revisited |
Previous Message | Michael Schmidt | 2007-01-28 01:26:45 | Password issue revisited |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-28 01:46:33 | Re: Password issue revisited |
Previous Message | Michael Schmidt | 2007-01-28 01:26:45 | Password issue revisited |