From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Change draft gmake control |
Date: | 2007-01-27 20:33:50 |
Message-ID: | 200701272033.l0RKXox24521@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Nothing, but the point is that draft is a modifier and it isn't clear
> >
> > >from that syntax that draft is a modifier and not a target.
> > >
> > > Anyway, certainly you could write this to preserve the target:
> > >
> > > draft:
> > > $(MAKE) html DRAFT=Y
> >
> > The problem is that the 'gmake' recursion is done, but then returns
> > and runs the hhml again, so 'gmake draft html' calls "$(MAKE) html
> > DRAFT=Y" and on return from that, the html is called again and
> > rebuilds, so it isn't really draft.
>
> Well, "gmake draft html" doesn't make any sense anyway, but "gmake
> draft" by itself does and the new way of writing it is significantly
> more cumbersome, so I request that this be fixed.
Well, if 'draft' was only for html, I could see suggesting just 'gmake
draft', but 'draft' can be used for Postscript and PDF too.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-27 20:47:55 | Re: [pgsql-patches] Change draft gmake control |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-27 16:38:03 | Re: [pgsql-patches] Change draft gmake control |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-27 20:47:55 | Re: [pgsql-patches] Change draft gmake control |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-01-27 20:21:04 | Re: Ctid chain following enhancement |