Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-01-27 15:05:33
Message-ID: 200701271505.l0RF5XC21382@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 08:41 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > What do people think about that? Does anyone think it would be an
> > unreasonable policy?
>
> I don't think so. You should build 8.0 binaries until the community
> stops maintaining PostgreSQL 8.0.
>
> This is what we do for RPMs -- I know it is really a lot of work to
> maintain older releases but as a community packager, it is not my "job"
> to force people to upgrade to new version by not supplying older
> binaries.

Agreed, and I do believe we should be supporting releases as far back as
reasonably possible.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-27 15:09:53 Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-27 14:17:14 Re: Stats collector frozen?