From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ruby-postgres module needs work, maintainer |
Date: | 2007-01-25 22:13:28 |
Message-ID: | 200701252213.l0PMDSH29937@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 15:18 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > ruby-postgres != plruby
> >
> > Oops, sorry. I got confused. I also have not heard from the
> > ruby-postgres guy, but as a community we are less likely to have heard
> > from him because interfaces are more independent.
> >
>
> I finally did reach the ruby-postgres guy. He said he would incorporate
> my patches.
>
> I'd like a real release (that becomes a gem), because the current ruby-
> postgres release is not sufficient (in a number of ways), and I got at
> least one response from someone who literally skipped PostgreSQL support
> in their app because of it:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/msg/450c15cb3848129b
>
> I expect there will be more patches also. Hopefully we can get this up
> to speed.
>
> I've been informed that the Ruby community's gem releases are heavily
> dependent on rubyforge. Without involvement of the rubyforge ruby-
> postgres project, releases would have to be under a different name
> (which would mean changing client code -- not desirable). This is my
> understanding, anyway.
Good, sounds like things are moving forward.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | imad | 2007-01-26 20:21:21 | Re: Query regarding PostgreSQL date/time binary format for libpq |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-01-25 22:10:45 | Re: ruby-postgres module needs work, maintainer |