| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recursive Queries |
| Date: | 2007-01-24 18:55:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200701241855.l0OIt8I06013@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> > I'm looking into recursive queries and what it would take to support them in
> > Postgres. Is anyone else looking at this already?
> >
> > Aside from the Oracle-ish syntax were there other objections to the patch as
> > posted a while back for 7.3 by Evgen Potemkin?
> >
> > I have some ideas myself for how to go about this but I'm going to review the
> > existing patch first. If anyone else has ideas I would like to hear them.
> >
> >
>
> My recollection is that the verdict was that it was clode to 100%
> unusable - you might want to review the past discussions.
Yes, the old patch is unusasble. The change has to be done in a
different part of the code.
> Wasn't somebody else working on this? Jonah? (Maybe you EDB guys need to
> talk more ...)
He is taking it over for Jonah.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-24 19:03:46 | Re: Recursive Queries |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-24 18:53:54 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |