From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Takayuki Tsunakawa <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too |
Date: | 2007-01-23 08:51:18 |
Message-ID: | 20070123085118.GA14759@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:35:11PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Takayuki Tsunakawa wrote:
> > From: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> > > OK, I have tested on MinGW and found I can use FormatMessage() to
> > print
> > > a description for all ERROR* system() failures, rather than print a
> > hex
> > > value. This removes the need for a URL or lookup of hex values.
> > > Attached and applied.
> >
> > Excuse me if I'm misunderstanding, but I'm afraid you are mixing up
> > Win32 error codes and exception codes. I saw the following fragment
> > in your patch:
> >
> > ! * On MinGW, system() returns STATUS_* values. MSVC might be
> > ! * different. To test, create a binary that does *(NULL), and
> > ! * then create a second binary that calls it via system(),
> > ! * and check the return value of system(). On MinGW, it is
> > ! * 0xC0000005 == STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION, and 0x5 is a value
> > ! * FormatMessage() can look up. GetLastError() does not work;
> > ! * always zero.
> >
> > Exception codes and error codes are different and not related. In the
> > above test, 0xC0000005 is an "exception code". On the other hand, what
> > FormatMessage() accepts is an error code. Error codes can't derived
> > from exception codes. Stripping off 0xC bit from an exception code
> > does not convert it to an error code.
> > I suspect the reason why you misunderstood is that the descriptions
> > are similar:
> > the description for exception 0xC0000005 (STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION) is
> > "access violation" (though the text can't be obtained). This is
> > caused by an illegal memory access. This is a program bug.
> > The description for 0x5 (ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED) is "Access is denied."
> > This is caused by permission checks. This is not a bug, and can
> > happen normally.
> >
> > Try "1.0 / 0.0" (devide by zero) instead of (*NULL). What would your
> > patch display? The exception would be 0xC000008E
> > (STATUS_FLOAT_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO), I think. 0x8E is ERROR_BUSY_DRIVE.
>
> Yes, you are 100% correct that I had exceptions and errors confused. I
> have backed out the patch that used FormatMessage(), and instead of
> using a URL, the message is now:
>
> child process was terminated by exception %X
> See /include/ntstatus.h for a description of the hex value.
>
> When I search for /include/ntstatus.h, I get the Wine page first, so
> hopefully we can mark this item as completed.
Are you entirely sure that ntstatus.h is where to look? Because per
whatever docs I've found, that contains "device driver errors" and *not*
exception codes.
If it really is, then using FormatMessage is correct - because it's not
an exception value, it'sa DDK error value. AFAIK, that's not the same
as an exception. (Though you have to add the search of ntdll.dll, of
course)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-01-23 09:03:11 | Re: Free space management within heap page |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-01-23 08:48:46 | Re: Free space management within heap page |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2007-01-23 08:52:28 | Re: server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal 7 |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-23 05:30:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too |