Re: Spam from EnterpriseDB?

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spam from EnterpriseDB?
Date: 2007-01-19 14:43:48
Message-ID: 20070119144348.GA84838@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:02:58PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:14:23PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > http://www.commandprompt.com/ :) We are more cost effective and have
> > been doing it for much, much longer ;)
>
> As somebody with a measure of influence over PostgreSQL work in my
> organization, I'll say that unsolicited email to my personal address
> has not gone unremarked.

I'd like to clarify my remarks: I wasn't referring to Joshua or to
Command Prompt, but rather to the unsolicited email I received from
That Other Company. I replied to Joshua's message to imply that
I'd be recommending that my organization consider talking to Command
Prompt.

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-01-19 14:47:53 Re: Password encryption method
Previous Message Jasbinder Singh Bali 2007-01-19 14:41:50 Re: Dynamic loading of Perl Code in Postgres functions