From: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com |
Cc: | itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows |
Date: | 2007-01-17 07:56:28 |
Message-ID: | 20070117081448.7477FDCC164@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> >> I think many people can benefit from Itagaki-san's proposal, and
> >> NO_BUFFERING should be default. Isn't it very rare that disks with
> >> sector size larger than 8KB are used?
> >
> > Definitly very rare.
> >
> >
> >> Providing a way (such as
> >> wal_sync_method) to avoid NO_BUFFERING is sufficient for people in
> >> rare environments. Or, by determining the sector size with
> >> GetDiskFreeSpaceEx(), we could auto-switch to not using
> NO_BUFFERING
> >> when the sector size is larger than 8KB.
> >
> > I think the second one is better.
>
> Thank you for agreeing. Then, I hope Itagaki-san's patch will be
> accepted when the following treatments are added to the patch and some
> performance report is delivered.
I would think so, but we definity need to see some numbers that show that it helps.
> > A quick google shows some inconclusive results :-)BUt look at for
> > example:
> >
>
http://groups.google.se/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/tree/browse_frm/thread/d3288d3b43338b47/ff5e825dd02faff4?rnum=1&hl=en&q=ntfs+sector+size&_done=%
2Fgroup%2Fmicrosoft.public.sqlserver.server%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fd3288d3b43338b47%2Fff5e825dd02faff4%3Ftvc%3D1%26q%3Dntfs+sector+size%26hl%3Den%26#doc_4556b6
4132b3baa7
> >
> > This seems to indicate that *Windows* supports sector sizes >4K, but
> SQL
> > Server doesn't. But again, it could be a mixup between cluster and
> > sector size...
>
> This is interesting. I've never seen systems with a sector size
> larger than 4KB, too. On IBM zSeries (which is a mainframe running
> Linux), DASD (direct attached storage device) is usually used as a
> hard disk. The sector size of DASD is 4KB. So, the current
> implementation of PostgreSQL which assumes 8KB sector size is
> practically sufficient.
> Delivering an intuitive error message like SQL Server is one way when
> PostgreSQL encounters devices with a larger sector size than is
> supported. However, as you say, auto-switching to not using
> NO_BUFFERING is kinder to users.
I think both. Auto-switch but log a warning to the user that this was done.
/Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tomas | 2007-01-17 08:03:31 | Re: Index for similarity search |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2007-01-17 07:54:12 | .po translation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wang Haiyong | 2007-01-17 08:34:16 | Re: With Function 'Chr', is it a bug? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-01-17 07:51:58 | Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows |