From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Enabling autovacuum by default (was Re: Autovacuum improvements) |
Date: | 2007-01-16 14:13:36 |
Message-ID: | 20070116141336.GU24671@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Actually the reason it's not enabled by default today has nothing to do
> with either of those; it's
>
> 3. Unexpected side effects on foreground processes, such as surprising
> failures of DROP DATABASE commands. (See archives for details.)
>
> Until (3) is addressed I don't think there is any chance of having
> autovac on by default, and so worrying about (1) and (2) seems a bit
> premature. Or at least, if you want to work on those fine, but don't
> expect that it will alter the fact that the factory default is "off".
With that taken care of, do I dare propose enabling autovacuum by
default, so that further changes will be picked up quickly by the
buildfarm?
Attached is a patch to do so, based on Peter's last attempt at doing
this.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
autovacuum-enable.patch | text/x-diff | 4.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-01-16 14:23:36 | Re: Autovacuum improvements |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-01-16 14:13:28 | Re: Function execution costs 'n all that |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-01-16 14:23:36 | Re: Autovacuum improvements |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-01-16 11:32:09 | pg_dumpall -f <filename> option |