Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Patrick Earl <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Date: 2007-01-12 15:07:18
Message-ID: 20070112150718.GA7442@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:47:55AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:39:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> One point worth making is that I'm not really convinced anymore that
> >> we have proof that antivirus code has been creating any such problems.
>
> > We do. I have positive proof of this being caused by AV software.
> > I don't know that it has been the problem in *all cases*, certainly, but
> > I've had kernel stacktraces pointing into AV filter drivers more than
> > once.
>
> No, I didn't claim that Windows AV software is bug-free ;-). What I
> said was that I'm not certain it's related to the "permission denied"
> reports, as opposed to other problems. Or are your stack traces
> specifically for "permission denied" failures?

I have at least two cases specifically for the permission denied
failures in postgres.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Amiel 2007-01-12 15:16:42 Re: Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-12 15:00:37 Re: Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2007-01-12 15:15:47 Re: Request for review: tsearch2 patch
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD 2007-01-12 15:07:07 Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.