Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.

From: jam(at)zoidtechnologies(dot)com
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Patrick Earl <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jam(at)zoidtechnologies(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Date: 2007-01-11 23:23:13
Message-ID: 20070111232312.GP20806@zoidtechnologies.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:12:07PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> It does seem like it might be a good idea to have FAQs based on each OS,
> yes? There are various things that effect each OS differently. The most
> obvious to me being shared memory and wal_sync_method.
>
> If could be a good idea to have.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>

+1

regards,
J

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-01-12 00:42:38 Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-01-11 23:12:07 Re: [HACKERS] Checkpoint request failed on version 8.2.1.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joachim Wieland 2007-01-11 23:32:07 Re: Recent ecpg patch...
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-01-11 23:14:34 Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2upgrade