| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
| Date: | 2007-01-09 18:41:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200701091841.l09IfT520056@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > The latter does not exist, AFAIK. Before feature freeze for cycle X, we
> > don't usually hold patches for release X+1, as I understand it.
> >
> > In general, we should try to hold patches as little amount of time as
> > possible. That way they don't go stale as easily.
>
> I did not follow this thread closely, but it would be nice if someone
> could compile all of these defacto standards into a wiki page.
The developer's FAQ has that information:
<P>A web site is maintained for patches awaiting review,
<a href="http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches">
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches</a>, and
those that are being kept for the next release,
<a href="http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold">
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold</a>.</P>
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-09 18:42:24 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2007-01-09 18:18:07 | Re: Autovacuum Improvements |