From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date: | 2007-01-09 18:41:29 |
Message-ID: | 200701091841.l09IfT520056@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > The latter does not exist, AFAIK. Before feature freeze for cycle X, we
> > don't usually hold patches for release X+1, as I understand it.
> >
> > In general, we should try to hold patches as little amount of time as
> > possible. That way they don't go stale as easily.
>
> I did not follow this thread closely, but it would be nice if someone
> could compile all of these defacto standards into a wiki page.
The developer's FAQ has that information:
<P>A web site is maintained for patches awaiting review,
<a href="http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches">
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches</a>, and
those that are being kept for the next release,
<a href="http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold">
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold</a>.</P>
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-09 18:42:24 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2007-01-09 18:18:07 | Re: Autovacuum Improvements |